"We argue that they don't have that authority.": A conversation with the attorney leading a federal proposed class-action lawsuit by NYC workers who lost their jobs under the City's vaccine mandates.
Christine Massey's work in which no one was able to provide proof of an isolated SARS-Cov 2 sample should be a clue that the whole virus theory is a fraud.
But let's play by THEIR rules. Let's assume Covid IS real. By their own rules there was no "pandemic." That is because the PCR test does not measure their definition of infection (which is viral load).
All they have are "cases" based on computer simulations, over 99% of which are either asymptomatic or minor cases of flu. But they still say the elderly for example are vulnerable. Even though Pfauci himself once said asymptomatic people do not spread disease. And of course, there's the fact of pre-existing conditions and environmental toxicity which is constantly minimized. This is the game they play. They want us to overlook these facts. It's called "gaslighting."
I tend to agree with Michael Crichton that there is “no such thing as consensus science”:
“Consensus science is an extremely pernicious development that ought to be stopped cold in its tracks. [I]t is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled.
In science, consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus. There is no such thing as consensus science. If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. If it’s science, it isn’t consensus. Period.”
Christine Massey's work in which no one was able to provide proof of an isolated SARS-Cov 2 sample should be a clue that the whole virus theory is a fraud.
But let's play by THEIR rules. Let's assume Covid IS real. By their own rules there was no "pandemic." That is because the PCR test does not measure their definition of infection (which is viral load).
All they have are "cases" based on computer simulations, over 99% of which are either asymptomatic or minor cases of flu. But they still say the elderly for example are vulnerable. Even though Pfauci himself once said asymptomatic people do not spread disease. And of course, there's the fact of pre-existing conditions and environmental toxicity which is constantly minimized. This is the game they play. They want us to overlook these facts. It's called "gaslighting."
Read Jon Rappoport's seminal blog: The Pandemic Pattern--How the Illusion is Built. https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/09/08/pandemic-pattern-how-illusion-is-built/
I tend to agree with Michael Crichton that there is “no such thing as consensus science”:
“Consensus science is an extremely pernicious development that ought to be stopped cold in its tracks. [I]t is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled.
In science, consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus. There is no such thing as consensus science. If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. If it’s science, it isn’t consensus. Period.”
https://mathewaldred.substack.com/p/doctors-being-silenced?utm_source=email
“Doctor” Fatty Arbuckle and Buster Keaton have joined forces to remind us “Trust the Science.” Watch TRUST THE SCIENCE RAG here: https://turfseer.substack.com/p/trust-the-science-rag